yowww! I'd missed that one.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Arrigo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:38 PM Subject: Re: voice over evaluation Another comment that Apple made was that fire fox is accessible, unless something has changed, this is incorrect. On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:40 PM, John Panarese wrote: > I agree. I must admit that I was both very surprised and quite > pleased. At least, it seems that A Mac was used and there was much > more thought put into this review. > > As for Open Office, I would not say that it is fully accessible, > but it surely is usable on a daily basis if one needed an office > suite. The spreadsheet is surely quite impressive. The word > processor takes some getting used to, but, again, one can use it. > > Take Care > > John Panarese > > On Nov 14, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Slau wrote: > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "kaare dehard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >>> It is certainly a more thoughtful >>> than the review done in 2005. I don't agree with all of it but >>> let's give em marks for effort this time round... >> >> I agree. I was a staunch critic of the 2005 review by Jay Leventhal >> but I sent him a message thanking him for a far better evaluation >> this time around and thanks to Jim Denham for his review. >> >> Slau >> >> > >
