agreed as I said in my first post, it makes you feel good. I know it ain't perfect, but they are a leding if not the leading publication for the blind.
----- Original Message ----- From: "kaare dehard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:28 PM Subject: Re: voice over evaluation It is certainly a more thoughtful than the review done in 2005. I don't agree with all of it but let's give em marks for effort this time round...On 13-Nov-08, at 9:06 PM, David Poehlman wrote: > I think he says that most apple apps are accessible and that is not > quite > true when you consider Ilife and Iwork...? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jacob Schmude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS > X by > theblind" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:01 PM > Subject: Re: voice over evaluation > > > It's not that bad, honestly. It's pretty fair, though there is a > couple errors in it, though mostly about the documentation. There was > only one error that I saw regarding Voiceover itself, and honestly I > was nitpicking :). He mixed up Dom and Group modes, and which one > gives a visual overview of the page--he said Dom mode does that, while > its actually group mode. > > > On Nov 13, 2008, at 20:28, Mike Arrigo wrote: > >> Hi all, well hereit is, access world's evaluation of voice over. I >> haven't read it yet, going to do that after I send this, here is the >> link. >> http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw090603 >> > > > > >
