----- Original Message ----- From: "kaare dehard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is certainly a more thoughtful
than the review done in 2005. I don't agree with all of it but let's give em marks for effort this time round...

I agree. I was a staunch critic of the 2005 review by Jay Leventhal but I sent him a message thanking him for a far better evaluation this time around and thanks to Jim Denham for his review.

Slau


Reply via email to