On 5/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no migration in OOo.
There is a migration from 1.1.x to 2.0.
The question is whether or not the migration is cost-effective.
[Actually, there also is a migration between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3, and
1.1.3 and 1.1.4.
In retrospect, for me, it was cost effective to migrate from 1.1.2 to
1.1.3 ZA. It was not cost-effective for me to migrate from 1.1.3 ZA
to 1.1.4 US, nor to 1.9.96 US.]
> OOo 1.1.n and OOo 2.0 basically use the same format, and it is documented,
> and access to the data does not necessitates OOo itself.
a) The default format of 1.1.x and 2.x are different.
b) The default setup for 1.1.x and 2.0x are different.
c) There are things that one can do with 1.1.3 ZA that not only are
not available, but SUN is adamant will never be available in another
version of OOo. Features that, if omitted in 2.0 should be treated as
Priority 1 bug fixes, because they cripple the functionality of OOo
2.0.
xan
jonathon
--
A Fork requires:
Seven systems with:
1+ GHz Processors
2+ GB RAM
0.25 TB Hard drive space
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
