what "things" are those Johnathon that can be done with 1.13 but can't be done since then?
Rigel On 5/19/05, Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no migration in OOo. > > There is a migration from 1.1.x to 2.0. > The question is whether or not the migration is cost-effective. > [Actually, there also is a migration between 1.1.2 and 1.1.3, and > 1.1.3 and 1.1.4. > In retrospect, for me, it was cost effective to migrate from 1.1.2 to > 1.1.3 ZA. It was not cost-effective for me to migrate from 1.1.3 ZA > to 1.1.4 US, nor to 1.9.96 US.] > > > OOo 1.1.n and OOo 2.0 basically use the same format, and it is documented, > > and access to the data does not necessitates OOo itself. > > a) The default format of 1.1.x and 2.x are different. > b) The default setup for 1.1.x and 2.0x are different. > > c) There are things that one can do with 1.1.3 ZA that not only are > not available, but SUN is adamant will never be available in another > version of OOo. Features that, if omitted in 2.0 should be treated as > Priority 1 bug fixes, because they cripple the functionality of OOo > 2.0. > > xan > > jonathon > -- > A Fork requires: > Seven systems with: > 1+ GHz Processors > 2+ GB RAM > 0.25 TB Hard drive space > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
