On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:30, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >>I can accept a copyright-style protection for your actual work.
> >
> > Stallman teaches us that copyright and patents are deeply different
> > beasts, so we shouldn't mix them, but, in the interest of a
> > stimulating and friendly discussion, I'll byte.
>
> Yes, indeed. I should have written the above more carefully.
>
> I believe your position is best shown in this example:
> > But if I had finished yesterday, after years of labor, the formula for
> > the film you used, maybe spending a lot of money, you copied the
> > formula today and, without even really understanding it, began to sell
> > tomorrow films at a cheaper price because you have no R&D costs to
> > recover, I'd be mightily pissed. That's why patents were invented.
>
> Now, I'm going to say something very radical: I disagree.
>
> "What? Is Daniel crazy? Did he just say not to reward hard work?"
>
> I'm not crazy yet :-) and I do see where you're comming from. But I
> think I have an interesting, and outside-the-box thought here:
>
> What you just described could be called a "big bang" development model.
> That is, an inventor works in secrecy for a long time, and one day
> announces to the world this one massive invention. I believe that this

One NZ inventor - Richard Pierce - who believed in this "working-in-secret" 
has the distinction of never having his inventions in the fields of aviation 
or anything else, actually get taken up anywhere.  So as an inventor he's 
incredible, as a practical success - he wasted his life.
> development model should be discouraged in favour of the "small step"
> model. Similar to the FOSS mantra "release early, and release often".
> The scientific community has been following it for a long time. And
> historically, most breakthroughs come from this model.
>
> A useful historical analogy is alchemy vs chemistry. Alchemy was
> developed in the big-bang model. People worked in isolation for long
> periods of time. During alchemy, very few advances were made. It wasn't
> until people started sharing ideas early and often that real progress
> was made. Once this happened, progress was very rapid, and gave rise to
> what we now call chemistry.
>
> Patents discourage small-step development in favour of the less
> productive big-bang development.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to