Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Randomthots wrote:
Now consider that ODF is a much richer format than HTML. And being
similar to HTML, there is no technical reason (that I see, anyway) that
the format couldn't be adapted to eventually replace HTML.
HTML is already TOO complex for mail. That's why it's rejected by so
many people. Didn't you read what I wrote last day ? Rich mail
acceptance requires a simplified SUBSET of HTML/XHTML, not a SUPERSET
like ODF.
I shudder a the number of cycles needed to filter a mailing list if its
default format changes to ODF.
Why are we arguing about HTML mail in an OOo Discuss list? But while we
are, I will just share what I think. An email is not meant to be a web
page. The only formatting that should remain in HTML mail are font,
size, text color (not background color) and images, which should by
default be blocked in your client until something is clicked.
