On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 10:06 -0600, Randomthots wrote: > I think one of the things to ask yourself is, "Why OOo at all?"
Because its a means to an end. > I think that you can't categorize these things as neatly as you would > like. I'm just saying what I use and why. Categories might or might not be useful. > > It doesn't surpise me, it just annoys me when arguments shift 180 > degrees depending on the point that's trying to be made. Get over it, this is politics and politics is not rational by definition and most active OOo people are pro-Open Source. > If running Outlook is not a > > priority to you why worry about it? > > Because we get a lot of requests for it on this list, and the replies > are sort of lame, mostly because the alternatives are sort of lame at > this point. So what do you intend to do about it? Change the things you can, accept the things you can't. You'll live longer that way. -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
