Daniel Carrera wrote:
Randomthots wrote:
Aha!! Information. At last. It's terse, sketchy, and comes with an
attitude, but at least it's a bit of data. Maybe... I notice you used
the word "probably". In other words, you don't know either.
But you're likely prone to disagree with me just on principle, so it
doesn't mean much.
Your kind of logic would fit well in the Intelligent Design movement.
That is, based on the fact that (for example, I) don't know where the
bottleneck is you conclude that the bottleneck must be the tag size.
<snip>
I agree. For another example of unexplained OO.o bottlenecks, why is it
that OO.o takes about 30 seconds to come up, both last year, on my
233Mhz, and then on my 900Mhz, no difference? My CPU monitor doesn't
show my system redlining, nor do I see a lot of heavy i/o activity on my
drive. Where's the bottleneck - is it translating the tags for the
interface?
mark
--
Q: What is the ultimate fate of the Univese?
A: We are *so* screwed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
