Randomthots wrote:
Aha!! Information. At last. It's terse, sketchy, and comes with an
attitude, but at least it's a bit of data. Maybe... I notice you used
the word "probably". In other words, you don't know either.
But you're likely prone to disagree with me just on principle, so it
doesn't mean much.
Your kind of logic would fit well in the Intelligent Design movement.
That is, based on the fact that (for example, I) don't know where the
bottleneck is you conclude that the bottleneck must be the tag size.
Now you've revealed the implicit assumption that the tags are actually
stored in plain text in RAM and copied redundantly. I see no reason why
that should be the case, and if it were, the problem would not be the
size of the tag, but the design of the application that copied redundant
data where a pointer would work better.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
\/_/ I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
