On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 16:13:47 PM +0100, Gianluca Turconi
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What you think you've seen in OOo or Novell Evolution are only clues
> and not evidences of a general problem.
No, sorry again. Please remember to not take this personally, but
"think you've seen" my foot. I have been *personally* told *here* to
contribute or shut up, I have *my* requests of support for Evolution
ignored for years now. And I *see* the same things happen regularly in
almost every FOSS forum I'm on: mutt, KOffice, AbiWord, procmail,
fedora, mandrake when I was using it, ubuntu-lite and many others. I
have only *mentioned* OOo and Evolution here because I'm sure
everybody on this list knows what those two programs are.
> Of course, I can accept your assumption and Andrew Brown's one too
> when we discuss in a mailing list where we can exchange our
> ideas. Instead, I don't accept it when it is used on a newspaper web
> site in order to show an axiom.
There is much more than an axiom to correct here (regardless of the
actual value of this specific article). And seeing it exposed on the
general press may just be what it's needed for traditional hackers to
see it.
Ciao,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
"To turn $100 into $110 is work. To turn $100 million into $110
million is inevitable" -- Edgar Bronfman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
