On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Andrew Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, again, almost all of this is catchup. Supplying dictionaries, > spell- checkers, proper documentation, user support, and so on, is > tremendously important, ad, when it is complete, will bring the > program up to the level that MS Office was, in most languages, eight > years ago. > > Meanwhile, the facts are as I stated them. Well, I don't like how you've written your article (or how it has been cut by editors) and I've tried to show you where you've mistaken, especially in two specific sentences and logic. Other people don't like what I write so the article itself is not a real problem as far as we admit we are not talking about "facts" but about personal opinions. I think you cannot claim you know everything or everybody in the OpenOffice.org project and you can expose a perfect anthropological and sociological study of the project, don't you? For example, you didn't know me! ;-) You've pictured an imagine of the project according to your opinion and that's fine for me. In your article you wrote: "As far as I know, in the five years..." that excuses the rest of the sentence that is wrong, at least in one case (mine). So please don't trespass on the border between opinions and facts. Regards, Gianluca -- Il futuro, duro come non lo avreste mai immaginato: http://www.internetbookshop.it/ser/serdsp.asp?shop=1&c=KEE4YJPPYO3IO Volete scoprire cosa spinge una persona a divenire scrittore? "Sturm und Drang": http://www.lulu.com/content/116405 Vi domandate come sarà il futuro dell'Unione Europea tra vent'anni? "La fine del gioco": http://www.lulu.com/content/95804 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
