Alexandro wrote: > What? I didnt get that at all. Can you clear your point.
I'll rewrite that. a) There is a FLOSS equivalent to Outlook --- with all of the functions of outlook --- that is no longer being developed, because people were not using it; b) That OOo + several other currently existing tools can be deployed _today_ that will give you more power and functionality than MSoffice with Outlook currently has; c) People that claim they will switch if a FLOSS equivalent exists are saying that to be polite. They are not sincere, because the equivalent currently exists; [ Other than the virri, and security problems. Both of those can be arranged, for those who really want them.] > So is a priority to distinguish the need vs the attachment to a tool. I am saying that people/companies are attached to the tool. The presence or absence of the specific tool is what moves them. IOW, they want an exact clone, with all of the malfunctions of the original. >or is it the integration they get with Exchange A FLOSS equivalent to Exchange currently exists; > And this db is very fast (sqlite I think). SQLite could be Incorporated into OOo. A new UI would be needed. xan jonathon -- Ethical conduct is a vice. Corrupt conduct is a virtue. Motto of Nacarima.
