On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:27:04 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote: >> Some people, who seem to be in key positions, like the way OO's internal >> structure is organized. >> > > ? > > That's a vague conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one. What changes > would you make to OO's "internal structure"?
"Internal structure" probably is the wrong technical term, but I'm referring to what goes on under the hood, namely, the various dialogs. The worst I've found is the mail merge. The database is up there too. The table of contents should be quite intuitive, but isn't close. I used to be fairly good at writing Word macros. Three years on, I still only 'record' OO Basic. I still don't understand how templates centralize changes in Styles data. In short, I love OO as deep at the document and menu levels, but deeper than that I find it extremely frustrating. I hope significant changes are being planned, as I'm tempted to migrate back, much as I don't want to. p. -- Using OOo 2.0.3 on Win XP sp2. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
