Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > one more possible thing to consider: there are patches which are not > seen as patches, as the patch submitter cannot change the status, and > the owner of the defect doesn't see that there is a patch, see for example: > > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72724 > > This is a patch, and the chances it will be applied are quite low, as > nobody knows who is responsible for French dictionaries now. Is this > counted as a non-processes patch or a defect in the statistics?
This is definitely a defect in the *process*, not in the statistics as I consider it to be fair to track only those patches that developers can spot easily. Thanks for the hint, Marcin. I will check this and see what we can do to improve the situation. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
