Jonathan,

jonathon wrote:

The only that counts is the one on Sun's website.  The rest
have no bearing on where the project goes,or what it does.

you still did not provide the links ...



Note, precise roadmaps for some / several future versions can only be given in 
a cathedral style project.

Since OOo is run as a cathedral style project by Sun, that
shouldn't make any difference.

That _is_ wrong. Though there may be the impression, this should be fixed.




Get rid of everything between /wiki/ and the name of the page.
Ahhh, so you against using "subpages" for organizing the wiki?! Why don't you just say so.


So you basically just want to prefix organizational pages with
"Organization" ? What is the advantage compared to subpages?

If the page describes how a specific project within OOo is
organized, then call it either _Project_xwy (organization)_
or _Organization(Project xyz)_.
This is effectively the same what subpages achieve, I am unsure why you prefer this style of organization, what are the advantages? Anything regarding searching ?


under wiki/Uno, pages related to but not belonging to Uno are located

I am advocating for the elimination of everything between
/wiki/and the page name.
But you still want to follow a systematic approach, don't you?



Your design requires that they know what project something
is in.  [How many people know that the education was a
sub-project under Ian, until he resigned that project.]
How many people know that the library project is under
marketing --- if they are even aware of its existence?   Or
What's the library project? Don't know it and can't find it.
realize that the a11y project has nothing to do with the
usability project?]
Can't find this on the accepted projects list as well.


??? It may be that the page is not perfect and that an image would be


I'm talking about the URL, not the content of the page.
I see.

My criticism is general, because the organization as a whole
is incomprehensible to anybody who hasn't been in a
bureaucracy for twenty years, that requires ISO 9000
procedures to be followed to the letter.
Sounds as it is _not_ worth to continue discussions with you.

xan

jonathon

Wish you a nice day

 Kay

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to