Hi,
I run two bridges on my openvswitch (ovsbr0, ovsbr1) both have redundant ports
(bond0, bond1 with lacp) since the port groups have different performance (1gbs
and 10gbs). Multiple internal interfaces are connected to the bridges and get
network traffic assigned based on the vlan tag.
Since version 3.10 of the kernel only works with the first bridge (ovsbr0) as
expected the second one gets not tagged traffic (untagged works fine!).
It makes no difference if I use the default kernel module or the upstream
datapath module.
Following configuration I tested:
Kernel 3.9.x and smaller have no issue
Kernel 3.10-rc1 and bigger (latest test 3.10.7) are affected
Openvswitch tools 1.4, 1.7, 1.10, 1.12 and 1.12.90 (latest git as Aug 19th) -
all show the same behavior
My config:
# ovs-vsctl show
Bridge "ovsbr1"
Port "ovsbr1"
Interface "ovsbr1"
type: internal
Port "bond1"
Interface "eth3"
Interface "eth2"
Port ifsys
tag: 4
Interface ifsys
type: internal
Bridge "ovsbr0"
Port ifsto
tag: 5
Interface ifsto
type: internal
Port "bond0"
Interface "eth0"
Interface "eth1"
Port "ovsbr0"
Interface "ovsbr0"
type: internal
ovs_version: "1.12.90"
# ovs-appctl lacp/show
---- bond0 ----
status: active negotiated
sys_id: 90:e2:ba:33:17:04
sys_priority: 65534
aggregation key: 1
lacp_time: slow
slave: eth0: current attached
port_id: 1
port_priority: 65535
may_enable: true
actor sys_id: 90:e2:ba:33:17:04
actor sys_priority: 65534
actor port_id: 1
actor port_priority: 65535
actor key: 1
actor state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
partner sys_id: b8:af:67:0c:01:4b
partner sys_priority: 32768
partner port_id: 212
partner port_priority: 32768
partner key: 41
partner state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
slave: eth1: current attached
port_id: 3
port_priority: 65535
may_enable: true
actor sys_id: 90:e2:ba:33:17:04
actor sys_priority: 65534
actor port_id: 3
actor port_priority: 65535
actor key: 1
actor state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
partner sys_id: b8:af:67:0c:01:4b
partner sys_priority: 32768
partner port_id: 106
partner port_priority: 32768
partner key: 41
partner state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
---- bond1 ----
status: active negotiated
sys_id: 00:25:90:94:a4:3c
sys_priority: 65534
aggregation key: 1
lacp_time: slow
slave: eth2: current attached
port_id: 1
port_priority: 65535
may_enable: true
actor sys_id: 00:25:90:94:a4:3c
actor sys_priority: 65534
actor port_id: 1
actor port_priority: 65535
actor key: 1
actor state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
partner sys_id: b8:af:67:0c:01:4b
partner sys_priority: 32768
partner port_id: 130
partner port_priority: 32768
partner key: 19
partner state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
slave: eth3: current attached
port_id: 2
port_priority: 65535
may_enable: true
actor sys_id: 00:25:90:94:a4:3c
actor sys_priority: 65534
actor port_id: 2
actor port_priority: 65535
actor key: 1
actor state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
partner sys_id: b8:af:67:0c:01:4b
partner sys_priority: 32768
partner port_id: 20
partner port_priority: 32768
partner key: 19
partner state: activity aggregation synchronized collecting distributing
# ovs-appctl bond/show
---- bond0 ----
bond_mode: balance-tcp
bond-hash-basis: 0
updelay: 0 ms
downdelay: 0 ms
next rebalance: 2904 ms
lacp_status: negotiated
slave eth0: enabled
active slave
may_enable: true
hash 29: 1 kB load
hash 99: 0 kB load
hash 238: 0 kB load
slave eth1: enabled
may_enable: true
hash 30: 0 kB load
hash 66: 0 kB load
hash 167: 0 kB load
hash 201: 0 kB load
hash 226: 0 kB load
---- bond1 ----
bond_mode: balance-tcp
bond-hash-basis: 0
updelay: 0 ms
downdelay: 0 ms
next rebalance: 2904 ms
lacp_status: negotiated
slave eth2: enabled
may_enable: true
hash 53: 0 kB load
slave eth3: enabled
active slave
may_enable: true
eth0, eth1 - 10gig interfaces
eth2, eth3 - 1gig interfaces
ifsto receives packets, ifsys not (in kernel 3.10, in kernel 3.9 both interface
are operational)
ovsbr0 and ovsbr1 both untagged, both receive packets
any more details needed?
Any solutions for my problem?
Regards
Andre
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
