Can you please provide the information that I originally requested (below)?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Andrey Korolyov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Observing the same issue in quite simple topo: > > Bridge "oswbr0" > Port "oswbr0" > Interface "oswbr0" > type: internal > Port "vnet0" > tag: 100 > Interface "vnet0" > Port "vnet1" > tag: 5 > Interface "vnet1" > Port "bond0" > Interface "bond0" > ovs_version: "1.10.0" > > bond0 is a regular linux bond configured as a OVS port. There is > simply no tagged traffic on this port but untagged works just fine. > > > Tested on both 3.10 ``stock'' module and on > 7395c05254df87ce52b37b04478e802befd799d9. Any suggestions are very > appreciated since I`m bounded with 3.10 and can not afford downgrade. > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Ruß, André <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I run two bridges on my openvswitch (ovsbr0, ovsbr1) both have redundant >>> ports (bond0, bond1 with lacp) since the port groups have different >>> performance (1gbs and 10gbs). Multiple internal interfaces are connected to >>> the bridges and get network traffic assigned based on the vlan tag. >>> >>> Since version 3.10 of the kernel only works with the first bridge (ovsbr0) >>> as expected the second one gets not tagged traffic (untagged works fine!). >>> >>> It makes no difference if I use the default kernel module or the upstream >>> datapath module. >> >> Can you run ovs-dpctl dump-flows and tcpdump when you have some vlan >> traffic running through each of the bridges and send that and the >> output of ovs-dpctl show? >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
