The same with just plain igb eth0, checked via port mirroring.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:15:24AM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> Bridge "oswbr0" >> Port "oswbr0" >> Interface "oswbr0" >> type: internal >> Port "vnet0" >> tag: 100 >> Interface "vnet0" >> Port "vnet1" >> tag: 5 >> Interface "vnet1" >> Port "bond0" >> Interface "bond0" >> ovs_version: "1.10.0" >> >> bond0 is a regular linux bond configured as a OVS port. There is >> simply no tagged traffic on this port but untagged works just fine. >> >> >> Tested on both 3.10 ``stock'' module and on >> 7395c05254df87ce52b37b04478e802befd799d9. Any suggestions are very >> appreciated since I`m bounded with 3.10 and can not afford downgrade. > > This seems likely to be a bug in or at least a surprising interaction > with the Linux bonding driver. I'd try using the OVS bonding support > to see if it makes a difference. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
