Tim,
That sounds good to me, no rush! BTW, the fact that you mention Spring makes me think that we should also coordinate with Rhett Sutphin who is maintaining the Spring extension (with great care) as this might have some impact on it as well. Maybe, we’ll end-up deciding that a specific Guice extension is better… Best regards, Jerome Louvel -- Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ <http://www.restlet.org/> http://www.restlet.org Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ <http://www.noelios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Tim Peierls Envoyé : dimanche 17 mai 2009 23:37 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Dependency injection in Restlet 2.0 with Guice Yes, I'd be interested. I'd like to find out more about how Spring (and others) will support javax.inject before going any further in code, though. --tim On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Jerome Louvel <[email protected]> wrote: Sounds good Tim. Would you be interested to contribute and maintain such an extension to Restlet? We could start by working in Restlet Incubator, using the com.google.inject package. Once javax.inject is available and the extension is stable, we could promote it as an official Restlet extension. Best regards, Jerome Louvel -- Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ <http://www.restlet.org/> http://www.restlet.org Noelios Technologies ~ Co-founder~ <http://www.noelios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Tim Peierls Envoy頺 jeudi 14 mai 2009 21:53 : [email protected] Objet: Re: Dependency injection in Restlet 2.0 with Guice On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jerome Louvel <[email protected]> wrote: By the way, do you think it would be technically possible to develop a similar integration that would leverage the recently announced javax.inject? http://crazybob.org/2009/05/announcing-javaxinjectinject. <http://crazybob.org/2009/05/announcing-javaxinjectinject.html> html If so, it could be an opportunity for a new Restlet extension. I'm sure it will be possible. I haven't worked out the details, but such an extension would provide an additional public interface, org.restlet.ext.inject.FinderFactory (better name needed?) and hooksfor obtaining a FinderFactory implementationthat would have to be specific to the injector implementation. In the mean time, the nice thing about javax.inject is that you should be able to use com.google.inject for now and later switch your imports to javax.inject when the support becomes available. --tim ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=2294385
