Word, I love it when you talk geek. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Matt Fanady <[email protected]> wrote:
> RF radiation is a "non-ionizing" form of radiation and does not cause > cellular damage in small exposures. It is no more dangerous than visible > light. You of course realize that visible light is the same thing as RF, > just at a higher frequency right? Please take your flame-bait elsewhere. > > -M@ > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Robert Broska <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Because gamma waves and RF/microwave radiation are identically >> carcinogenic and genotoxic to the cellular roots of life, the safe dose of >> either kind of radiation is zero. No study has proven that any level of >> exposure from cell-damaging radiation is safe for humans. Dr. Carlo confirms >> that cell damage is not dose dependant because any exposure level, no matter >> how small, can trigger damage response by cell mechanisms.8 >> >> >> >> >> This is quoted from the extensively footnoted site: >> >> >> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List >> To unsubscribe, please visit: >> http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List > To unsubscribe, please visit: > http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org > -- "Those who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Franklin
_______________________________________________ SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List To unsubscribe, please visit: http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
