Ok sounds good On Monday, February 10, 2014, Justin Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we are set for 7. > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Becca Salchak > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> Did we decide on a time for tonight? >> >> >> On Sunday, February 9, 2014, Michael Griesacker >> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> wrote: >> >>> I'll look for my springloaded briefcase. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Becca Salchak <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> I think the 7 that have stepped up is a great group. Good representation >>> of our needs and membership >>> On Feb 9, 2014 11:57 AM, "Philip P. Patnode" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> FYI >>> >>> A casual search in the tubes using the search term "ideal committee >>> size" reveals that a committee of 1 is the best, but 5 is an efficient >>> number to get something done. >>> >>> More than five leads to excessive discussion and delayed decisions. >>> >>> Even numbers may result in a deadlock at voting time. >>> >>> I sincerely hope that the newly formed floorplan committee can meet and >>> make a firm decision is under 2 hours. >>> >>> Start the meeting with a countdown timer on the table set for 2 hours. >>> >>> Assume the timer is hooked up to a briefcase full of over-stimulated >>> Tribbles that it will open at the end of the countdown. >>> >>> With hope for some action, >>> >>> PPP >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Becca Salchak <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> I agree with Mike that way we can actually decide on something >>> On Feb 9, 2014 8:33 AM, "Michael Griesacker" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I would like to be on the committee as well, and am available Monday >>> evening for a meeting. I think it appropriate to have an uneven number of >>> members, and with Andrew being #6, I could fulfill that as #7. >>> On Feb 7, 2014 12:06 AM, "Andrew Buczko" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I will like to be on the committee. >>> I can be there Monday. >>> And my membership is in good standing. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I will be available monday afternoon as well. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> >>> >>> *To:* SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2014 5:09 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [SH-Discuss] another zoning proposal >>> >>> On Thursday, February 06, 2014 16:12:00 Craig Bergdorf wrote: >>> > I'll happily draw it up as it's being discussed. I am also busy with >>> > SparkAK this weekend, what about tonight at 8? If not, then how about >>> > Monday? >>> >>> Monday works. Lets do Monday. I'll be there after 6 PM for more p >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Becca Salchak >> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> peace and love >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > -- Becca Salchak [email protected] peace and love
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
