The only instance when consensus does not work in large groups is when someone decides to make it fail.
The fact that consensus may fail is not a reason to abandon it. This speaks to what I see as the core of hacker philosophy - the risk of failure must not keep you from trying. On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:19 AM, Andrew Buczko <[email protected]> wrote: > Torie, The meeting minutes from : > https://synhak.org/wiki/Meetings/2013-01-01 > Say nothing about "how" we decide on a proposal. The meeting minutes only > refer to the Proposal page: > https://synhak.org/wiki/Proposals > The Proposal page Has the basic rules on how we decide on proposals, but it > was last modified on 19 March 2014, at 16:23. > > Being that this is a wiki and I just verified that I can change the document > to say what ever I want it to say then I / we cannot trust that this is how > it's has always been. > > Plus, even if it has been, I don't see consensus working in a larger group. > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
