I notice that MySpace is so darn slow! Is that the servers or the code I
wonder? 


Robert P. Reil
Managing Director,
Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc.
4292 Country Garden Walk NW
Kennesaw, Ga. 30152
Office 770-974-8851
Fax 770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:12 AM
To: Carbs Sales&Service
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth

The MySpace servers running BlueDragon.NET are all still 32-bit. As for
64-bit support, I spoke at a conference in Rome last November with Ben
Forta, where he said publicly it's unlikely that Scorpio will provide native
64-bit support. You can also read the comments by Damon Cooper (CFMX
Director of Engineering) regarding 64-bit support (he's less than
enthusiastic):

 
http://www.fekke.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/12/20/Does-ColdFusion-need-64-bit-S
upport-Short-answer-Yes

Our plans are to provide native 64-bit support for BlueDragon 7.0 on the
widest number of platforms possible. In fact, there's already a beta of
native 64-bit BD 7.0 for Red Hat Linux 4 (RHEL4) and the x64 architecture:

 
ftp://ftp.newatlanta.com/public/bluedragon/7_0b2/server/BlueDragon_Server_JX
_70_326-Linux64.sh

Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven 
> Ross
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:48 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
> 
> I think the most interesting part is that they no longer use CF, 
> actually the article mentions that they moved away from CF awhile ago.
> And the reason why they are using BD .NET is because they want to run 
> native .NET code as it is faster. Granted it is probably faster due to 
> the fact that it can actually utilize the 64 bit processor better than 
> running CF on 32 bit java under a 64bit OS/CPU (not the only reason 
> but, probably one).
> I hope this issue is addressed with the release of scorpio.
> 
> If you want to understand this you can read this article by Andy 
> (http://www.infoaccelerator.net/index.cfm/2006/12/7/ColdFusion
> --64Bit-and-What-It-Means-To-You)
> 
> 
> On 1/18/07, Alex Pilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 7:04 PM -0500 1/18/07, Alex Pilson wrote:
> > >It's quite an interesting read on scalability and how they
> dealt with
> > >it. Coldfusion mentioned.
> > >
> > >http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,2082921,00.asp
> >
> > Oh I forgot and BlueDragon.NET!
> > --
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @
http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to