That seems a curious statement, Forrest, and I'm sure some would enjoy a bit of discussion on it. For those who weren't following closely, he had asked first about some challenges using a CFX_google custom tag, and in the replies he was told that it's quite old and instead Google favors some Ajax APIs instead. Forrest replies he hoped the "Ajax thing would just go away".
So, do you realize that Ajax is merely a way to make browsers smarter? It enables them to make calls to remote servers. Sure, we could do that in the past with Java applets, ActiveX controls, Flash, and even plain Javascript. And we could of course do it from the server using either REST or SOAP apis. Ajax is just a simplified API to enable that very javascript-based client-server interaction. For those who need to talk to servers from clients (either because they can't or don't want to involve a server to proxy the communications for them), we don't want them to go back to Java and ActiveX, do we? :-) And while we may wish everyone would use Flex, it's just not likely. Many will, for the much larger problem space it solves, but for the average web developer, it's not really as simple as dropping in some AJAX API calls. If Google (or other vendors) want to create a way for people to connect, and they want to make it work regardless of what web app server platform people use (and as well for those who have no server), and they provide an Ajax-based API to what (I suppose are otherwise REST-based) services, that's seems to be just being smart, widening the pool of possible users. Look at it another way (for us CFers), they (like Amazon, Ebay, and others) could instead just document calling from Java, ASP.NET, and PHP. They tend to not go that one step further to include CF. At least by their offering a platform-agnostic solution that doesn't require any server-side processing, they've helped more than just those who have no server to make calls from. Just some thoughts. I'm not fanatical about all this, and I may well myself be missing a point. But since this is the ACFUG "discussion" list, that comment seemed one worth discussing. :-) /charlie -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Forrest C. Gilmore Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:30 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] JVM version and ColdFusion Thanks, Charlie. Your comments were very helpful! I have been hoping that this AJAX thing would just go away, as it seems to be to be a step backwards, but it looks like it will be around a while longer! Forrest C. Gilmore ======================== Charlie Arehart wrote: > Forrest, I realize you've perhaps abandoned the effort, but I'll throw > out some clarification if it's useful, first about the JRE/CFX issue, > then about calling the google search APIs. <snip> ------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Sponsor FigLeaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
