Another thing to consider is XML structure verification. Flex, to the
best of my knowledge, does not provide XSD verification. So if you are
consuming a third party webservice (for instance) you'll need to verify
data integrity before you can successfully parse your returned data set.
For example when I wrote a parser for the Amazon.com XML API I had to
provide for omitted (optional) fields. When returning a query object in
CF however, you are at least gauranteed that a calumn will exist (even
if it may be empty). I've consumed data sets in the 10-30k range with
very little impact.


Darin Kohles, Application Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Positions, Inc.
2289 Peachtree Road NE
Atlanta, GA 30309

404-351-2366 phone
404-351-4055 fax
http://www.d-p.com/ 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Fore
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:43 PM
To: AFFUG
Subject: [AFFUG Discuss] XML vs. Query via Remote Object from CF

Hey,

I'm sure someone's studied this but I couldn't find it. If I'm getting a
large dataset from a CFC, what's the difference in overhead between
using XML as a data provider vs a query in a remote object?

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right
thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you
can do is nothing." - Theodore Roosevelt


-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, simply email the list with unsubscribe in
the subject line

For more info, see http://www.affug.com
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40affug.com/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, simply email the list with unsubscribe in the 
subject line

For more info, see http://www.affug.com
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40affug.com/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to