* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote, On 26/09/06 22:41: > I should have been more clear, I was trying to avoid being rude to > ams. > > I fail to see where you were rude to me in anyway. > > It was a truncation of a longer response where I was saying that > ams should not have kept out of politics. > > I meant that the participation methods of FSF act as a selector of > participants thus rendering ams conclusion meaningless, and > supporting you. > > Sorry not to have been clear enough. > > I wasn't confused before, but now I am, I don't understand the two > above sentences at all. > So now to clear things up, I say what I intended not to say. (Reply accidentally sent seperately in response to original message)
Sam _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
