On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 18:44 +0200, Benoît Jacob wrote: > Many thanks, Simo! > > Just one thing, if I may ask: did I make it clear that our library is a > _template_ library? > > What makes me fear I might not have been clear enough on this point, is that > you say: > > > [2]: you must either use the library as a dynamically linked object or > > provides at least binary .o files and the build system to recompile the > > whole program if the LGPL library is statically compiled in. > > This doesn't seem to apply to a template library, right?
Not sure how (c) works with a template library, I think LGPL may be too complex to apply in this case. I'd go for either the GPL or a very liberal license like X11. Simo. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
