* Benoît Jacob: > Thanks very much for your answers. > >> See the C++ run-time library >> and the GNAT run-time library for examples (Ada is quite similar to >> C++, at least in GCC's implementation). > > What do you call the C++ runtime library? I looked at the GNU STL, but all I > saw was the GPL2 license unmodified.
The exception is mentioned in the corresponding header files. > Also I couldn't find the license for the GNAT runtime library, any link? It's also mentioned in the source files. > Can I ask you if you might help us fill the table in my first post? If I > understand well, Simo's answer, though useful, wasn't specific to the case of > a template library. Okay, here's my try: +------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | | a program or library licensed under the... | | +-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ | | GPL | LGPL | BSD | Non-free |Non-free | | | | | (no ad | but sources| closed- | | | | | clause)| available | source | +------------------+-----------+-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ | can use a C++ | | | | | | | | template library | GPL | yes | NO | NO | no | no | | licensed under | | | | | | | | the ... +-----------+-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ | and still remain | | | | | | | | distributable | LGPL | yes | yes | ** | MAYBE | NO | | under its own | | | | | | | | license +-----------+-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ | | | | | | | | | | BSD | YES | YES | yes | YES | YES | | | | | | | | | | +-----------+-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ | | | | | | | | | | add your | | | | | | | | idea here | | | | | | |------------------+-----------+-----+------+--------+------------+---------+ **: Depends on the availability of source code. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
