"Andrés G. Aragoneses" <[email protected]> writes: > I think it makes more sense for them to embrace a common license, > and much better if it's blessed by the FSF, instead of each one > adopting a very similar one.
Well, I'm not going to tell anyone not to discuss or ask questions. But I think your chances of getting a new license “blessed by the FSF” are vanishingly small. These companies that want license terms already had the opportunity to get a blessed-by-the-FSF license: the GPLv3, which was the result of unprecedented input and discussion from the entire software community. I would expect you will have better results encouraging companies to use those well-understood license terms. -- \ “I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I | `\ like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.” —Bilbo | _o__) Baggins | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
