Noah Slater wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:54:06PM -0500, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" wrote: >> So, should I start in this mailing-list the discussion and elaborate on >> the motivations of why this new license is needed and why the existing >> licenses do not fit with this model? Or should I contact other FSF staff >> via other means? Any FSF member reading? > > I'm an associate member, and I know some staffers. Does that count? ;)
Perfect, I invite you to participate on the discussion, as I posted the ideas in a new thread (following advice from Stefano and Alessandro). Could you also tell the staffers you know to post their opinions? > My advice to you would be to email [email protected] and see what they think. Well, I think I already contacted them via this email, but I was replied by only one person (which turns out to belong to one of the "reluctant" groups I talk about in the new thread) and I think this needs to be discussed in a global way like a mailing list. > You might also want to contact the OSI about this. As far as I understand, OSI is more oriented to less-restrictive open source licenses, right? Then I guess they wouldn't be very interested. Thanks. -- Andrés G. Aragoneses Software Engineer [email protected] Novell, Inc. http://www.novell.com/ Software for the open enterprise _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
