Am Montag, dem 09. M�r 2009 schrieb Alfred M. Szmidt: > > > You might also want to contact the OSI about this. > > > > As far as I understand, OSI is more oriented to less-restrictive > > open source licenses, right? > > No, by definition OSI is interested in all Free Software licenses > (which they call "open source") - this includes the licenses with > strong freedom protection like GNU GPLv3. > > They are also interested in non-free licenses as well, e.g. the NASA > public license.
Stop spreading FUD! It is true that this license was accepted by the OSI but rejectet by the FSF. But it just was a rather minor problem why it was rejected by the FSF. -- AKFoerster _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
