> convincing more than 18 thousand people code paid by > public money should be published as Free Software
Funny that you declare you don't know the "demos" of the fellowship, although we pay (I myself no more) the membership fee through channels that easily let identify who we are and on the other hand you know that those 18 thousand people were “convinced”, when they simply might have shown their support to an idea older that FSFE's campaign. > A radical shift of structure (like moving to a "large membership" > model) may promise some advantages down the road, but it may also > could dimish the good work going on, Suppressing the fellowship seat was a radical shift (otherwise no need for an extraordinary gathering), right? What are the reasons that the council think this move would not “dimish the good work going on”? > > Best Regards, > Bernhard Best Regards, Besnik _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
