Stefan, > I clearly quoted to Matthias's email, was that hard to understand this.
because of the HTML format of the email you were citing, I wasn't sure if you really meant to support what you have cited or meant the included citation of the email that redated it. > I don't think l have posted anything disrespectful here, ever in this ml. > > So be nice and respect my feedback/opinion and stop with your lecturings > plus insinuations pls. At least the above statement is something that I could read as disrespectful, as I merely wanted to understand what you mean. The second part of my email was to repond to what you have only cited and originated from [email protected]. > Stop talking on behalf of Matthias Kirchner and let him exercise his own > defence. I don't think I called you into this, don't remember mentioning > your name. Please respect that I can speak out for whomever I'd like, whenever I like. This is our mailinglist, so it's partly mine and I blieve I can speak out, just like anybody to defend a civil tone here. The statements you've cited are not civil in my opinion. > Not accusations but issues. Up to now I believe I have responded to all questions, to some questions more then once. This a least clarifies the position where I stand. And it saves others to to explain some of the things which have been explained before. I don't think it necessarily takes FSFE's anchor person to respond to each question, especially when it was already explained sufficiently (for most) by many. Best Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
