Most software efforts that go open source do so to improve their software
thru collaborative effort. Like most groups, we hope that openness and
utility will attract others to contribute and use our software because of
the freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose *other than
censorship.*

The FOSS space is already crowded with Software that does not address the
issue of organizational censorship. If a set fellows wants to do something
like seek collaboration against censorship, why should their effort be
divided?


On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:11 AM Federico klez Culloca <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Il 9 maggio 2019 15:58:38 CEST, Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
> >
> >As James Otis put it:
> >
> >   "taxation without representation is tyranny."
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Daniel
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discussion mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
> Ok, but then again, I support some medical research association here in
> Italy. I don't expect a seat at the table when they make any decision. I'm
> just a supporter, and I don't see this as tyranny. I continue sending them
> money on my own volition.
>
> Back to the discussion at hand, the point is that the FSFE decided to not
> have the fellowship anymore and switch to a supporter model instead. I
> think that's fine and has been done in a transparent way (that is, former
> fellows received communication about it). At that point people could decide
> whether to continue contributing or to withdraw their support. I don't see
> any problem with this.
>
> The fact is that if the fellowship doesn't exist anymore *internally* I
> see no point in continuing to pretend it's still there. It should be
> accepted that if it exists it's something outside the FSFE, and that's fine
> as well.
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to