On 16/05/2019 22:33, Kristian Rink wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 21:08 +0200 schrieb Daniel Pocock: >> >> It shows that a censor was thinking about whether or not to let us >> see the message. >> >> Even if the message was eventually delivered, the fact that messages >> from some or all users are being examined one by one by somebody in >> Berlin is chilling. >> > > As far as I remember, this used to be a valid and common practise on > the majority of public mailing lists I used to use as a student, > called"moderation" back then... > When I was a student, I don't remember students doing anything in moderation. But when the subject is elected by the community and dirty politics are afoot, censorship is the word to use. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Software... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Software... simon
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Sof... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free... Florian Snow
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: ... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Censorship [... Florian Snow
- Re: One more example of Censors... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Cen... Florian Snow
- Re: One more example of Cen... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Censorship [... Kristian Rink
- Re: One more example of Censors... Daniel Pocock
- Re: One more example of Censorship [... Christian Kalkhoff
- Re: One more example of Censorship Eike Rathke
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Sof... Besnik Bleta
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Software... Myriam Schweingruber
- Re: One more example of Censorship [Re: Free Sof... Besnik Bleta
