* Christian Imhorst <christian.imhorstatfsfe.org> [2019-09-23 17:47]: > Dear Daniel, > > > Am 23. September 2019 18:32:50 MESZ schrieb Daniel Pocock <daniel at > pocock.pro>: > >on FSF mailing lists, "we are now having to review posts before they > >are > >distributed". Clearly, posts which don't suit the narrative of the > >coup, like mine, will not get through. > > that's because you are part of the problem and not part of the solution. > > I am glad that Stallman is no longer president of the FSF. I hope > they will find someone who will represent our hopefully more diverse > movement better.
It is wrong. FSF was and has legal obligation to remain apolitical. GNU project was never discriminatory and shall remain apolitical. No feminism politics or any other kind of politics are allowed in GNU project. Your opinion will be valid when you do some of free software speeches like RMS is doing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCh8EcBrptA As you are doing that from fsfe.org email address now I consider FSFE politically biased, taking stances in politics other than free software and thus not true to free software philosophy. FSFE cannot be trusted for reasons of supporting the apolitical GNU free software philosophy. It can be trusted by people who support their different politics, but not true free software activists who guard freedom zero for software to be used by everybody. FSFE cannot be trusted to promote free software for everybody when having staff members or members using their official domain fsfe.org to take political stances. Jean _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
