On 14/10/2019 11:25, [email protected] wrote:
>> Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> hat am 12. Oktober 2019 um 21:16
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>>
>> The case for Matthias Kirschner's resignation as FSFE president is more
>> serious than the case for RMS's resignation.
>>
>> Does anybody agree that at least one of the points on this list is more
>> serious than all the false allegations misquoting RMS combined?
>>
>> If so, should Kirschner resign too?
>>
>> Here is the charge sheet:
>> ...
>
> The events of 2016 would be added. (Sorry long threats and in German.) I'm
> thinking since 2016 whether my money for the FSF and FSFE memberships should
> not go better to the Debian Project and/or the CCC. Both do more for free
> software and internet freedom!
Debian changes leader every year. Debian has also refused to discuss
the secret Google donations[1] or the last Debian Project Leader, Chris
Lamb and his girlfriend Molly de Blanc ("Mollamby") going together[2] to
an event in Australia.
My suggestion is to pool your money in local groups with people you can
meet in person from time to time. You can also send money directly to
the developers of any project you really want to support. I'm not
asking for your money but I might make some more suggestions soon.
>
> 7. The closure of the FSFE office in Düsseldorf, system administration and
> merchandising concept.
>
> ¹https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/rheinland/2016q1/003135.html
> ²https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/rheinland/2016q2/003242.html
Can you summarize, how many people stopped donating? How many stopped
volunteering? Where there any other measurable consequences of the
decision to close Düsseldorf?
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://danielpocock.com/google-money-censorship-free-software/
2. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/thank-you-linux-conf-australia
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
