> Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> hat am 12. Oktober 2019 um 21:16 > geschrieben: > > > > The case for Matthias Kirschner's resignation as FSFE president is more > serious than the case for RMS's resignation. > > Does anybody agree that at least one of the points on this list is more > serious than all the false allegations misquoting RMS combined? > > If so, should Kirschner resign too? > > Here is the charge sheet: > ...
The events of 2016 would be added. (Sorry long threats and in German.) I'm thinking since 2016 whether my money for the FSF and FSFE memberships should not go better to the Debian Project and/or the CCC. Both do more for free software and internet freedom! 7. The closure of the FSFE office in Düsseldorf, system administration and merchandising concept. ¹https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/rheinland/2016q1/003135.html ²https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/rheinland/2016q2/003242.html Ciao Marco! _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
