Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Chris,
 
The big problem there is that dansguardian is licensed to be free only for non-commercial use.  The same is true for DCC which is a component of copfilter.
There are alternatives to dansguardian such as squidguard and urlfilter. Is there an alternative to DCC?
  This means that while businesses are using these tools, they're using them in violation of their license.  I don't know how the authors of pfSense feel about putting license encumbered packages together.
I think the users are totally unaware of the license encumbered components. However if there are alternative components to the license encumbered components then the features of the content filtering in copfilter are what makes it so popular. On the main website of IPCop it now says that there have been 2.5 million downloads of it in one year. I do not think that the IPCop developers have measured to what extent the addons have popularized the project.
 
-Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Re: Content Filtering

Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Chris,
 
I'm looking at the web page for copfilter and it's a decent enough looking project, although it seems to be geared more towards virus and spam filtering for email, and virus filtering of http traffic.  Is that an accurate statement? 
Yes that would be an accurate statement. However the biggest issue with IPcop and addons such as copfilter is that when IpCop is updated is breaks the addon.
If so, it will not do the same job that squid+squidGuard is accomplishing.
 copfilter has further addons such as dansguardian .
which has the same function as squidguard.

Also, since copfilter incorporates a few license-encumbered components (i.e.: DCC) it would not be appropriate for businesses who want to use pfSense.
 I think that it is the features and functions of copfilter that make it so popular, not necessarily particular components. I notice that its proponents implement it in businesses rather than home users, so the content filtering is more popular among business users where as squidguard, urlfilter and dansguardian seem to be more popular among home users.
 
-Gary
 


Reply via email to