I have been using iperf to test between between the pfsense
connection that I have and another pfsense server that I run
at another location. But there is nothing to do to check the
connection else were.

Even when I do a traceroute from the pfsense server local to
me to the second pfsense server, it gets lost trying to get
a full response..

# traceroute 200.76.246.66
traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 64 hops max, 40
byte packets
 1  red-corp-200.56.96.177.telnor.net (200.56.96.177)  2.328
ms  2.295 ms  2.404 ms
 2  red-corp-200.23.251.193.telnor.net (200.23.251.193)
5.743 ms  5.815 ms  5.861 ms
 3  red-corp-200.76.250.13.telnor.net (200.76.250.13)  6.157
ms  12.360 ms  6.203 ms
 4  red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94)  8.108
ms  8.945 ms  8.150 ms
 5  red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70)  18.049 ms
16.959 ms  19.318 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
* * *

So it makes for difficulties to really analyze what is going
on.

K.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:57:51PM -0600, Nick Buraglio wrote:
>Also understand that testing commodity internet access is very  
>nebulous.  So many things can affect the path.  In my opinion the  
>best way to test throughput is using iperf, to do so would require a  
>host on either end running it.  If you plan on testing using iperf  
>I'd suggest testing in stages; Last mile, provider, some facility  
>that has decent connectivity, etc..
>How are you testing?
>
>
>On Feb 21, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote:
>
>>Take it out and test without it.   If the results are the same then  
>>you can point at them.  Why is the Cisco in there?  If I'm  
>>understand correctly, you have:
>>
>>[some internet connecton] <=> [Cisco 2500] <=> [pfSense box] <=> [LAN]
>>
>>Is the cisco doing some kind of routing?  What is the model of the  
>>first box?
>>
>>
>>nb
>>
>>
>>On Feb 21, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>
>>>I have pfsense connected to a Cisco 2500 for the WAN
>>>connection. Attached to the Cisco via a high speed serial
>>>cable to a box that say World DSL. I can't get any specifics
>>>on the capabilities of the DSL box. When I did telnet the
>>>box, I get connected to another Cisco router which I cannot
>>>access.
>>>
>>>Allegedly, the connection is suppose to be an E-1 (2048
>>>kbit/sec), but the speeds on my end fluctuates between
>>>800K-1100K/sec down and 40K-300K/sec up. I suspect that the
>>>connection to the Cisco that I have access to is actually
>>>some ADSL connection.
>>>
>>>Of course, the ISP that I am consulting with is blaming
>>>pfsense. What can I do to prove that pfSense it working
>>>optimally and the problem is with the telco?
>>>
>>>Any pointer would be greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>>K.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to