In this case check with you're isp and see if they have a speedtest site setup. That's what my ISP does atleast.
On 2/21/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, > > You were right on the money! > > # traceroute -I 200.76.246.66 > traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 64 hops max, 60 > byte packets > 1 red-corp-200.56.96.177.telnor.net (200.56.96.177) 3.315 > ms 2.407 ms 2.000 ms > 2 red-corp-200.23.251.193.telnor.net (200.23.251.193) > 15.100 ms 13.217 ms 19.954 ms > 3 red-corp-200.76.250.13.telnor.net (200.76.250.13) > 14.373 ms 7.470 ms 17.098 ms > 4 red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94) 21.048 > ms 16.939 ms 19.609 ms > 5 red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70) 25.062 ms > 17.161 ms 17.297 ms > 6 red-corp-200.76.246.66.telnor.net (200.76.246.66) > 20.591 ms 17.237 ms 16.994 ms > > Now, since I can't use iperf to measure with the exception > of the last of the last host 200.76.246.66, what can I do > the measure the reported of the hosts in between the > starting host and the end host. > > I need to prove that I am not having a full E-1 connection > coming to me. Or at least show that there is some ADSL > connection going... > > K. > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:03:27PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote: > >ICMP vs UDP. See my last post. > > > >On 2/21/06, Craig FALCONER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sounds like telnor.net is blocking stuff. > >> > >> Try mtr and see if it works. I can get to 200.76.246.66 without loosing > >> anything if I use mtr..... > >> > >> My traceroute [v0.69] > >> socks (0.0.0.0)(tos=0x0 psize=64 bitpattern=0x00) Wed Feb > >> 22 09:00:22 2006 > >> Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit > >> Packets > >> Pings > >> Host Loss% Snt Last Avg > >> Best Wrst StDev > >> 1. lemonsqueezer.avonside.school.nz 0.0% 24 0.3 0.3 > >> 0.2 0.4 0.0 > >> 2. fe7-4-515-1.bertha.paradise.net.nz 0.0% 24 9.5 10.1 > >> 8.8 12.7 1.1 > >> 3. 203.96.153.102 4.2% 24 12.8 15.1 > >> 12.8 20.5 1.6 > >> 4. pe14-bertha.paradise.net.nz 0.0% 23 15.6 14.2 > >> 10.5 21.3 2.3 > >> 5. 203.167.223.129 0.0% 23 11.8 13.8 > >> 10.8 19.9 2.1 > >> 6. ge0-1-0-938.icore1.sym.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 27.2 26.3 > >> 23.6 33.2 2.0 > >> 7. ge-0-2-0-1.xcore1.acld.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 25.4 24.4 > >> 22.2 28.8 1.8 > >> 8. ge-0-2-0-914.xcore2.acld.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 26.1 25.8 > >> 22.7 41.3 3.9 > >> 9. so.jb.wils.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 159.8 154.4 > >> 149.2 162.1 4.8 > >> 10. 65.244.201.221 0.0% 23 150.0 150.8 > >> 147.8 155.5 1.7 > >> 11. GigabitEthernet3-0.GW1.LAX1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 153.8 151.6 > >> 148.0 158.1 2.2 > >> 12. 0.so-0-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 149.4 156.1 > >> 148.4 215.7 13.7 > >> 13. 0.so-6-0-0.CL2.LAX15.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 153.4 152.7 > >> 149.3 159.1 2.6 > >> 14. POS5-0.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 151.0 152.4 > >> 148.4 162.5 3.5 > >> 15. wcgGigELAX-gw.customer.alter.net 0.0% 23 164.3 165.4 > >> 161.5 172.9 3.0 > >> 16. anhmca1wcx2-pos6-1-oc48.wcg.net 0.0% 23 167.2 165.5 > >> 160.9 175.3 3.7 > >> 17. anhmca1wcx4-pos6-0.wcg.net 0.0% 23 164.9 164.4 > >> 161.6 170.3 2.7 > >> 18. telmex-anhmca1wcx4-pos-10-0-wcg.net 0.0% 23 165.9 165.9 > >> 163.4 171.0 1.9 > >> 19. red-corp-200.76.250.45.telnor.net 0.0% 23 321.1 323.2 > >> 321.1 328.1 1.6 > >> 20. red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net 0.0% 23 319.5 318.4 > >> 315.6 320.9 1.4 > >> 21. red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net 0.0% 23 328.6 329.0 > >> 326.8 334.9 2.0 > >> 22. red-corp-200.76.246.66.telnor.net 0.0% 23 335.9 334.7 > >> 330.7 347.4 3.5 > >> > >> ...but if I use traceroute I get this: > >> > >> > >> socks:~# traceroute 200.76.246.66 > >> traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets > >> 1 lemonsqueezer (192.168.1.1) 0.494 ms 0.277 ms 0.283 ms > >> 2 fe7-4-515-1.bertha.paradise.net.nz (202.0.37.1) 10.919 ms 11.620 ms > >> 14.394 ms > >> 3 203.96.153.102 (203.96.153.102) 16.474 ms 15.097 ms 16.545 ms > >> 4 pe14-bertha.paradise.net.nz (203.96.155.226) 12.527 ms 12.516 ms > >> 13.195 ms > >> 5 203.167.223.129 (203.167.223.129) 13.993 ms 14.111 ms 12.632 ms > >> 6 ge0-1-0-938.icore1.sym.telstraclear.net (203.98.48.1) 26.604 ms > >> 25.879 > >> ms 24.655 ms > >> 7 ge-0-2-0-1.xcore1.acld.telstraclear.net (203.98.50.251) 27.084 ms > >> 24.410 ms 24.100 ms > >> 8 ge-0-2-0-914.xcore2.acld.telstraclear.net (203.98.42.18) 26.674 ms > >> 24.462 ms 25.942 ms > >> 9 so.jb.wils.telstraclear.net (203.98.42.66) 151.823 ms 153.014 ms > >> 149.533 ms > >> 10 65.244.201.221 (65.244.201.221) 151.059 ms 150.438 ms 150.465 ms > >> 11 GigabitEthernet3-0.GW1.LAX1.ALTER.NET (157.130.245.21) 151.583 ms > >> 148.077 ms 150.594 ms > >> 12 0.so-0-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.112.214) 154.385 ms 150.544 ms > >> 149.351 ms > >> 13 0.so-6-0-0.CL2.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.222) 153.938 ms 154.141 ms > >> 149.308 ms > >> 14 POS5-0.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.115.213) 154.119 ms 149.706 ms > >> 156.302 ms > >> 15 wcgGigELAX-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.42.202) 164.367 ms 165.480 > >> ms 172.955 ms > >> 16 anhmca1wcx2-pos6-1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.140.161) 163.032 ms 163.138 > >> ms > >> 162.029 ms > >> 17 anhmca1wcx4-pos6-0.wcg.net (64.200.141.94) 162.788 ms 162.340 ms > >> 163.445 ms > >> 18 telmex-anhmca1wcx4-pos-10-0-wcg.net (64.200.224.150) 166.515 ms > >> 175.247 ms 171.111 ms > >> 19 red-corp-200.76.250.45.telnor.net (200.76.250.45) 321.772 ms 327.205 > >> ms 323.200 ms > >> 20 red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94) 317.589 ms 325.669 ms > >> 317.674 ms > >> 21 red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70) 329.632 ms 327.279 ms > >> 328.071 ms > >> 22 * * * > >> 23 * * * > >> 24 * * * > >> etc > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kim C. Callis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2006 8:33 a.m. > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] [OT] Networking help > >> > >> > >> I have been using iperf to test between between the pfsense > >> connection that I have and another pfsense server that I run > >> at another location. But there is nothing to do to check the > >> connection else were. > >> > >> Even when I do a traceroute from the pfsense server local to > >> me to the second pfsense server, it gets lost trying to get > >> a full response.. > >> > >> # traceroute 200.76.246.66 > >> traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 64 hops max, 40 > >> byte packets > >> 1 red-corp-200.56.96.177.telnor.net (200.56.96.177) 2.328 > >> ms 2.295 ms 2.404 ms > >> 2 red-corp-200.23.251.193.telnor.net (200.23.251.193) > >> 5.743 ms 5.815 ms 5.861 ms > >> 3 red-corp-200.76.250.13.telnor.net (200.76.250.13) 6.157 > >> ms 12.360 ms 6.203 ms > >> 4 red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94) 8.108 > >> ms 8.945 ms 8.150 ms > >> 5 red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70) 18.049 ms > >> 16.959 ms 19.318 ms > >> 6 * * * > >> 7 * * * > >> 8 * * * > >> 9 * * * > >> * * * > >> > >> So it makes for difficulties to really analyze what is going > >> on. > >> > >> K. > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:57:51PM -0600, Nick Buraglio wrote: > >> >Also understand that testing commodity internet access is very > >> >nebulous. So many things can affect the path. In my opinion the > >> >best way to test throughput is using iperf, to do so would require a > >> >host on either end running it. If you plan on testing using iperf > >> >I'd suggest testing in stages; Last mile, provider, some facility > >> >that has decent connectivity, etc.. > >> >How are you testing? > >> > > >> > > >> >On Feb 21, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote: > >> > > >> >>Take it out and test without it. If the results are the same then > >> >>you can point at them. Why is the Cisco in there? If I'm > >> >>understand correctly, you have: > >> >> > >> >>[some internet connecton] <=> [Cisco 2500] <=> [pfSense box] <=> [LAN] > >> >> > >> >>Is the cisco doing some kind of routing? What is the model of the > >> >>first box? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>nb > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>On Feb 21, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Kim C. Callis wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>I have pfsense connected to a Cisco 2500 for the WAN > >> >>>connection. Attached to the Cisco via a high speed serial > >> >>>cable to a box that say World DSL. I can't get any specifics > >> >>>on the capabilities of the DSL box. When I did telnet the > >> >>>box, I get connected to another Cisco router which I cannot > >> >>>access. > >> >>> > >> >>>Allegedly, the connection is suppose to be an E-1 (2048 > >> >>>kbit/sec), but the speeds on my end fluctuates between > >> >>>800K-1100K/sec down and 40K-300K/sec up. I suspect that the > >> >>>connection to the Cisco that I have access to is actually > >> >>>some ADSL connection. > >> >>> > >> >>>Of course, the ISP that I am consulting with is blaming > >> >>>pfsense. What can I do to prove that pfSense it working > >> >>>optimally and the problem is with the telco? > >> >>> > >> >>>Any pointer would be greatly appreciated! > >> >>> > >> >>>K. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >> >
