Sounds like telnor.net is blocking stuff.
Try mtr and see if it works. I can get to 200.76.246.66 without loosing
anything if I use mtr.....
My traceroute [v0.69]
socks (0.0.0.0)(tos=0x0 psize=64 bitpattern=0x00) Wed Feb
22 09:00:22 2006
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
Packets
Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg
Best Wrst StDev
1. lemonsqueezer.avonside.school.nz 0.0% 24 0.3 0.3
0.2 0.4 0.0
2. fe7-4-515-1.bertha.paradise.net.nz 0.0% 24 9.5 10.1
8.8 12.7 1.1
3. 203.96.153.102 4.2% 24 12.8 15.1
12.8 20.5 1.6
4. pe14-bertha.paradise.net.nz 0.0% 23 15.6 14.2
10.5 21.3 2.3
5. 203.167.223.129 0.0% 23 11.8 13.8
10.8 19.9 2.1
6. ge0-1-0-938.icore1.sym.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 27.2 26.3
23.6 33.2 2.0
7. ge-0-2-0-1.xcore1.acld.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 25.4 24.4
22.2 28.8 1.8
8. ge-0-2-0-914.xcore2.acld.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 26.1 25.8
22.7 41.3 3.9
9. so.jb.wils.telstraclear.net 0.0% 23 159.8 154.4
149.2 162.1 4.8
10. 65.244.201.221 0.0% 23 150.0 150.8
147.8 155.5 1.7
11. GigabitEthernet3-0.GW1.LAX1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 153.8 151.6
148.0 158.1 2.2
12. 0.so-0-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 149.4 156.1
148.4 215.7 13.7
13. 0.so-6-0-0.CL2.LAX15.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 153.4 152.7
149.3 159.1 2.6
14. POS5-0.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET 0.0% 23 151.0 152.4
148.4 162.5 3.5
15. wcgGigELAX-gw.customer.alter.net 0.0% 23 164.3 165.4
161.5 172.9 3.0
16. anhmca1wcx2-pos6-1-oc48.wcg.net 0.0% 23 167.2 165.5
160.9 175.3 3.7
17. anhmca1wcx4-pos6-0.wcg.net 0.0% 23 164.9 164.4
161.6 170.3 2.7
18. telmex-anhmca1wcx4-pos-10-0-wcg.net 0.0% 23 165.9 165.9
163.4 171.0 1.9
19. red-corp-200.76.250.45.telnor.net 0.0% 23 321.1 323.2
321.1 328.1 1.6
20. red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net 0.0% 23 319.5 318.4
315.6 320.9 1.4
21. red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net 0.0% 23 328.6 329.0
326.8 334.9 2.0
22. red-corp-200.76.246.66.telnor.net 0.0% 23 335.9 334.7
330.7 347.4 3.5
...but if I use traceroute I get this:
socks:~# traceroute 200.76.246.66
traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 lemonsqueezer (192.168.1.1) 0.494 ms 0.277 ms 0.283 ms
2 fe7-4-515-1.bertha.paradise.net.nz (202.0.37.1) 10.919 ms 11.620 ms
14.394 ms
3 203.96.153.102 (203.96.153.102) 16.474 ms 15.097 ms 16.545 ms
4 pe14-bertha.paradise.net.nz (203.96.155.226) 12.527 ms 12.516 ms
13.195 ms
5 203.167.223.129 (203.167.223.129) 13.993 ms 14.111 ms 12.632 ms
6 ge0-1-0-938.icore1.sym.telstraclear.net (203.98.48.1) 26.604 ms 25.879
ms 24.655 ms
7 ge-0-2-0-1.xcore1.acld.telstraclear.net (203.98.50.251) 27.084 ms
24.410 ms 24.100 ms
8 ge-0-2-0-914.xcore2.acld.telstraclear.net (203.98.42.18) 26.674 ms
24.462 ms 25.942 ms
9 so.jb.wils.telstraclear.net (203.98.42.66) 151.823 ms 153.014 ms
149.533 ms
10 65.244.201.221 (65.244.201.221) 151.059 ms 150.438 ms 150.465 ms
11 GigabitEthernet3-0.GW1.LAX1.ALTER.NET (157.130.245.21) 151.583 ms
148.077 ms 150.594 ms
12 0.so-0-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.112.214) 154.385 ms 150.544 ms
149.351 ms
13 0.so-6-0-0.CL2.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.222) 153.938 ms 154.141 ms
149.308 ms
14 POS5-0.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.115.213) 154.119 ms 149.706 ms
156.302 ms
15 wcgGigELAX-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.42.202) 164.367 ms 165.480
ms 172.955 ms
16 anhmca1wcx2-pos6-1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.140.161) 163.032 ms 163.138 ms
162.029 ms
17 anhmca1wcx4-pos6-0.wcg.net (64.200.141.94) 162.788 ms 162.340 ms
163.445 ms
18 telmex-anhmca1wcx4-pos-10-0-wcg.net (64.200.224.150) 166.515 ms
175.247 ms 171.111 ms
19 red-corp-200.76.250.45.telnor.net (200.76.250.45) 321.772 ms 327.205
ms 323.200 ms
20 red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94) 317.589 ms 325.669 ms
317.674 ms
21 red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70) 329.632 ms 327.279 ms
328.071 ms
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
etc
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim C. Callis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2006 8:33 a.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] [OT] Networking help
I have been using iperf to test between between the pfsense
connection that I have and another pfsense server that I run
at another location. But there is nothing to do to check the
connection else were.
Even when I do a traceroute from the pfsense server local to
me to the second pfsense server, it gets lost trying to get
a full response..
# traceroute 200.76.246.66
traceroute to 200.76.246.66 (200.76.246.66), 64 hops max, 40
byte packets
1 red-corp-200.56.96.177.telnor.net (200.56.96.177) 2.328
ms 2.295 ms 2.404 ms
2 red-corp-200.23.251.193.telnor.net (200.23.251.193)
5.743 ms 5.815 ms 5.861 ms
3 red-corp-200.76.250.13.telnor.net (200.76.250.13) 6.157
ms 12.360 ms 6.203 ms
4 red-corp-200.38.27.94.telnor.net (200.38.27.94) 8.108
ms 8.945 ms 8.150 ms
5 red-corp-200.38.8.70.telnor.net (200.38.8.70) 18.049 ms
16.959 ms 19.318 ms
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
* * *
So it makes for difficulties to really analyze what is going
on.
K.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:57:51PM -0600, Nick Buraglio wrote:
>Also understand that testing commodity internet access is very
>nebulous. So many things can affect the path. In my opinion the
>best way to test throughput is using iperf, to do so would require a
>host on either end running it. If you plan on testing using iperf
>I'd suggest testing in stages; Last mile, provider, some facility
>that has decent connectivity, etc..
>How are you testing?
>
>
>On Feb 21, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Nick Buraglio wrote:
>
>>Take it out and test without it. If the results are the same then
>>you can point at them. Why is the Cisco in there? If I'm
>>understand correctly, you have:
>>
>>[some internet connecton] <=> [Cisco 2500] <=> [pfSense box] <=> [LAN]
>>
>>Is the cisco doing some kind of routing? What is the model of the
>>first box?
>>
>>
>>nb
>>
>>
>>On Feb 21, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>
>>>I have pfsense connected to a Cisco 2500 for the WAN
>>>connection. Attached to the Cisco via a high speed serial
>>>cable to a box that say World DSL. I can't get any specifics
>>>on the capabilities of the DSL box. When I did telnet the
>>>box, I get connected to another Cisco router which I cannot
>>>access.
>>>
>>>Allegedly, the connection is suppose to be an E-1 (2048
>>>kbit/sec), but the speeds on my end fluctuates between
>>>800K-1100K/sec down and 40K-300K/sec up. I suspect that the
>>>connection to the Cisco that I have access to is actually
>>>some ADSL connection.
>>>
>>>Of course, the ISP that I am consulting with is blaming
>>>pfsense. What can I do to prove that pfSense it working
>>>optimally and the problem is with the telco?
>>>
>>>Any pointer would be greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>>K.
>>>
>>
