On 7/3/06, Greg Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given pfsense's target market & being realistic and politically incorrect, the true 'need' for double A WAI conformance would be rather low on any priority list.
Ok, I was supposing that.
Not saying that they don't exist, but as with seriously visually impaired lollipop men/crossing guards, security admins with a similar handicap are rather thin on the ground. Those who would blindly (pun intended) reject a highly specialised niche product on the basis of non WAI compliance, should be looking for employment elsewhere.
:-) IMHO, I think WAI web pages can be also useful for people without impairments... Also, I've found that sometimes it is mandatory to use accessible software on government or public founded organizations (at least on the part of the world that I live on). I always see as a good idea to have "some" conformance with WAI, but I agree with you in that it does not appear to be a common wanted feature. Anyway, knowing that XHTML and CSS are planned in CVS HEAD is good news for me. I'm happy with this.
