"multiple concurrent PFSense instances"
no, you have also missed my point... i'm not interested in vistualizing
"pfsense"
my idea was to "provide" VT options, a dom0, "along side" pfsense... as it
is available in Linux.
| OS --> service (file)
cloud --> pfsense --> VT --> | OS --> service (mail)
| OS --> service (database)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Greg Hennessy <[email protected]>wrote:
> As the others have said, it depends on what you mean by 'integrate'
>
> Ignoring the lack of Xen dom0 support in FreeBSD for a moment.
> Utilising VT technology to deliver physical as well as logical isolation of
> multiple concurrent PFSense instances in a manner analagous to
>
> Fortinet VDOM : http://kc.forticare.com/default.asp?id=2065&Lang=1&SID=
>
> or
>
> Juniper VSYS :
> http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200103.pdf
>
> Does have a certain attraction from a managed service perspective.
>
> Hosting applications within domUs running on PFSense. A complete waste of
> time.
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* pfsense sense [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 28 January 2009 00:42
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
>
> has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
>
> i might be loosing my mind but wouldn't it be nice to have a pfsense
> running on harware and a vistualization environemnt that allow us to install
> our OS's of choice perfectly protected behind pfsense ?
>
> does anything else think it's a good idea ?
>
