Quoting E L, from the post of Mon, 17 Oct: > Hey, > It seem that the person who told me about the license misinterpeted the fact > the docs are still in debian > as a sign that it correlate with the DFSG. It seem he was assume like few > other debian people that if it's GPL compatible > it's DFSG free. > > *sigh* and I was so happy to finally find a license....
sorry for barging in, but what's wrong with the GPL itself? -- Hunter/Gatherer Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
