ביום שלישי, 18 באוקטובר 2005, 00:05, נכתב על ידי Ira Abramov: > sorry for barging in, but what's wrong with the GPL itself? GPL is for code, not documentation.
Imagine for example a situation in which you distribute some documentation and want people to print it and charge for it (commercial distribution), however you are publishing the documentation in PDF format. With GPL you also need to provide the source (latex, openoffice, doc, html whatever), but this is not the issue here. The most important thing in documentation is the content, not the media. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
