On 11/30/05, Alon Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And still there are a lot of extentions to the RFC, why limit ourselves in the takanon to one specific
brand?Most servers supports many more and then you need to check every command you use during the meeting
to see if it is compatible with the RFC.
I know that what you mean, I'm just saying it can be understood in both ways
and therefore probebly be written in a more clear way.
Like hamakor only promise accibility to people which uses opensource programs.
To prevent repeating problems I think Hebrew as single langauge should be decided upon.
I also think that encoding might be a problem as the loved mirc client doesn't support unicode.
What's the advantage of public voting over private one?
especialy in a vote that doesn't happen in the same time and people can see what other people are voting.
So maybe you should add that votes must happen using an open standard?
How does it prevent them from seeing what happens during the vote?
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, E L wrote:
> 2)The irc part is vague, can we use only networks that support that specific
> protocol with no extentions?What happens if someone uses colors during the
> discussion?
The protocol discusses how information is transferred, not what information
or how it is encoded.
And still there are a lot of extentions to the RFC, why limit ourselves in the takanon to one specific
brand?Most servers supports many more and then you need to check every command you use during the meeting
to see if it is compatible with the RFC.
> and the בלבד in the end of the sentence is out of place IMOH as it can be
> read as making sure only people with who uses free IRC client can
> participate.
The scope of the בלבד was for the words תכנה חופשית - meaning people who
only use free software. This is to prevent using, say, an ActiveX control by
saying that people who use Firefox on Windows can access it.
I know that what you mean, I'm just saying it can be understood in both ways
and therefore probebly be written in a more clear way.
Like hamakor only promise accibility to people which uses opensource programs.
> BTW in what langauge would the discussions be?what encoding would you use?
This is up to the board to announce before the assembly.
To prevent repeating problems I think Hebrew as single langauge should be decided upon.
I also think that encoding might be a problem as the loved mirc client doesn't support unicode.
> How would it make sure to keep privacy of the voters?
It won't. It will publish the names of the voters and their votes for the
record. Votes will not be anonymous.
What's the advantage of public voting over private one?
especialy in a vote that doesn't happen in the same time and people can see what other people are voting.
> Would it also be on irc?
This is up to the board discretion.
So maybe you should add that votes must happen using an open standard?
> 5) Why do we need 2 groups for voting?Isn't one enough? ( I never saw
> anything like that anywhere else)
This is to ensure the people close to the operation of the system will not
know the votes of the others during the vote.
How does it prevent them from seeing what happens during the vote?
Alon
Ely
