On Tuesday 24 January 2012 13:02:25 Tomer Cohen wrote: > Why do you think that intentional security holes are breaking the GPL?
It's not the holes that violate the GPL, but the claim of copyright. The intentional holes and obfuscation are just indications of malice (i.e. that the GPL violation is not an innocent mistake). _______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
