I wouldn't care to see Log4J dependency, primarily because Log4J is so much larger than displaytags. If you really really really want to tie displaytags to a logging framework of some kind (which I'd advise against), go for commons-logging, as it's far smaller and is a front for JDK 1.4's logging, LN2, and log4j as well.
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Luiz-Otavio Zorzella wrote: > Hi, > > the display tag library is entirelly lacking logging messages -- I wish > to know if anyone objects to my adding a log4j dependency to it... > > Zorzella > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger > for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and > disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX > and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com > _______________________________________________ > displaytag-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
